Co-design: Towards a new ecological paradigm in art and design

Authors

  • O. V. Dyachenkova Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» Автор

Keywords:

biodesign, bioart, biomimicry, biomimetics, bio-inspired design, biotechnology, sustainability, ecology, nature, living materials, science art

Abstract

The article examines the rethinking of nature in contemporary art and design practices. Special attention is paid to the use of living organisms, which become a design tool and change the processes of production, agriculture, food culture, medicine, clothing, and energy sources. In numerous studies, design, done in conjunction with living organisms, has been identified as a new ecological paradigm that acts as a solution to the catastrophic consequences of the industrial revolution and modern production methods. In the academic field, the morphology of the new ecological paradigm has barely been formed. The paper analyzes an approach to art and design based on mimicry of nature, its imitation, and a biointegrated approach, using living materials and processes. It is concluded that both approaches are based on the same scientific method, which implies interdisciplinary design activities and collaboration between artists, designers, biologists and representatives of the respective scientific fields. Particular attention is paid to the description of terms with the prefix bio, such as biomorphism, biomimetics, biomimicry and bionics, which are part of the bio-inspired approach. We note the essential difference between biomimetics and biomimicry and the practice of biodesign, where living organisms are used as the main component of a product. Two ways of working with the living organism are highlighted: by choosing biological raw materials of plant, animal or microbial origin, and by the participation of the living component in the functioning of the product. Thus, the article shows how artists and designers within the new ecological paradigm work with living materials and attempt to move beyond a human-centered understanding towards design with nature. The conclusion identifies a number of challenges in scaling this practice and applying product prototypes to real-world production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Байкова 2011 — Байкова Е. В. Биоморфизм как система образного моделирования в культуре: Дис. … д-ра культурологии / Саратовский гос. тех. ун-т. Саратов, 2011. Стрижак, Казакова 2020 — Стрижак А. В., Казакова Н. Ю. К вопросу о происхождении и использовании термина «биоморфизм» // Дизайн и технологии. № 78 (120). 2020. С. 14–21.

Шукурова б. д. — Шукурова А. Н. «Искусства и ремёсла» // Большая российская энциклопедия: [Электрон. версия]. URL: https://old.bigenc.ru/fine_art/text/2022363.

Bennett 2004 — Bennett J. The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter // Political Theory. Vol. 32. No. 3. 2004. P. 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260853.

Benyus 1997 — Benyus J. Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1997.

Braidotti 2013 — Braidotti R. Posthuman humanities // European Educational Research Journal. Vol. 12. No. 1. 2013. P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1.

Carson 1962 — Carson R. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.

Chayaamor-Heil et al. 2024 — Chayaamor-Heil N., Houette T., Demirci Ö., Badarnah L. The potential of co-designing with living organisms: Towards a new ecological paradigm in architecture // Sustainability. Vol. 16. No. 2. 2024. 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020673.

Fayemi et al. 2014 — Fayemi P. E., Maranzana N., Aoussat A., Bersano G. Bio-inspired design characterisation and its links with problem solving tools // Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference — Design 2014. May 19–22, 2014, Dubrovnik — Croatia. Vol. 1 / Ed. by D. Marjanov, M. Storga, N. Pavkovic, N. Bojcetic. Dubrovnik: Sveučilišna tiskara, 2014. P. 173–182.

Fisch 2017— Fisch M. The nature of biomimicry: Toward a novel technological culture // Science, Technology, & Human Values. Vol. 42. No. 5. 2017. P. 795–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916689599.

Frosch, Gallopoulos 1989 — Frosch R. A., Gallopoulos N. E. Strategies for manufacturing // Scientific American. Vol. 261. No. 3. 1989. P. 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144.

Fu et al. 2014 — Fu K., Moreno D., Yang M., Wood K. L. Bio-inspired design: An overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy // Journal of Mechanical Design. Vol. 136. No. 11. 2014. 111102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028289.

Fuller, Kuromiya 1982 — Fuller R. B., Kuromiya K. Critical path. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1982.

Haddon 1914 — Haddon A. С. Evolution in art: As illustrated by the life-histories of designs. London: Walter Scott, 1914.

Hayes et al. 2020 — Hayes S., Desha C., Baumeister D. Learning from nature — biomimicry innovation to support infrastructure sustainability and resilience // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 161. 2020. 120287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120287.

Jacobs 2014 — Jacobs S. Biomimetics: A simple foundation will lead to new insight about process // International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. Vol. 9. No. 2. 2014: 9. P. 83–94. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N2-83-94.

Karana et al. 2020 — Karana E., Barati B., Giaccardi E. Living artefacts: Conceptualizing livingness as a material quality in everyday artefacts // International Journal of Design. Vol. 14. No. 3. 2020. P. 37–53.

Migayrou 2013 —Migayrou F. Naturalizing architecture // Naturaliser l’architecture = Naturalizing architecture / Ed. by M. A. Brayer, F. Migayrou. Orleans: HYX, 2013. P. 38–59.

Myers 2012 — Myers W. Bio design: Nature. Science. Creativity. New York: Thames and Hudson, 2012.

Myers 2022 — Myers W. Emerging bioart and biodesign: [E-book] / With contributions from G. McDowall, R. Baaklini, X. van der Eijk. 2022. (Bio Art & Design Award). URL: https://www.badaward.nl/assets/site/Emerging20Bioart202620Biodesign-gecomprimeerd.pdf.

Papanek 1971 — Papanek V. Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. New York: Pantheon Books, 1971.

Pedersen Zari 2019 — Pedersen Zari M. Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry. London: Routledge, 2019.

Pohl, Nachtigall 2015 — Pohl G., Nachtigall W. Biomimetics for architecture & design: Nature — analogies — technology. Berlin: Springer, 2015.

Smith et al. 2020 — Smith R. S. H., Bader C., Sharma S., Kolb D., Tang T. C., Hosny A., Moser F., Weaver J. C., Voigt C. A., Oxman N. Hybrid living materials: Digital design and fabrication of 3D multimaterial structures with programmable biohybrid surfaces // Advanced Functional Materials. Vol. 30. No. 7. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907401.

Williams, Collet 2020 — Williams N., Collet C. Biodesign and the allure of “grow-made” textiles: An interview with Carole Collet // GeoHumanities. Vol. 7. No. 1. 2020. P. 345–357. https:// doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2020.1816141.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dyachenkova O.V. Co-design: Towards a new ecological paradigm in art and design // Shagi. 2025. Vol. 11, no. 2. P. 150–163.