Технография вместо этнографии? Биоиндустриальная онтология электрички, или Особенности переплетения человеческих и нечеловеческих нарративов
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2021-7-2-175-192Ключевые слова:
технография, шизоанализ, биоиндустриальность, мобильные методы, Guattarian studies, аффект, электричка, коллективный ассамбляж высказывания, онтологияАннотация
Изучение нечеловеческой субъективности, в том числе с точки зрения антропологии, подводит к вопросу о том, какие рамки и границы есть у социального знания: концепция «нечеловека» преимущественно используется в качестве призмы, через которую можно смотреть на общество и культуру. Субъективность в нечеловеческой онтологии обычно определяется способностью (не) действовать, т. е. агентностью. Переосмыслению этой риторики способствует трансверсальный концепт субъективности - коллективный ассамбляж высказывания - французского психоаналитика Ф. Гваттари, который смещает акцент на то, как производится субъективность материальным или нематериальным образом. Поиск адекватной методологической оптики приводит к возможности замены «этно-» на «техно-» для преодоления дисциплинарных ограничений этнографии, обусловленных ее укорененностью в конвенциональных категориях идентичности, не учитывающих радикальную технологическую медиацию. Такая парадигма подталкивает к аффективной концептуализации биоиндустриального взаимодействия с «неживой», материальной сущностью, с техникой или машинами. Общественные транспортные средства, особенно те, что преодолевают значительные расстояния, представляют собой яркий пример ассамбляжа; в качестве партиципанта моего технографического праксиса выступает постсоветский электропоезд.Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Appel, H., Anand, N., & Gupta, A. (2018). Introduction: Temporality, politics, and the promise of infrastructure. In N. Anand, A. Gupta, & H. Appel (Eds.). The promise of infrastructure (pp. 1-41). Duke Univ. Press.
Balkmar, D., & Mellström, U. (2019). Towards an anthropology of transport affect. In
T. P. Uteng, H. R. Christensen, & L. Levin (Eds.). Gendering smart mobilities. Routledge.
Bissell, D. (2010). Vibrating materialities: Mobility-body-technology relations. Area, 42(4), 479-486.
Bissell, D. (2014). Transforming commuting mobilities: The memory of practice. Environment and Planning A, 46(8), 1946-1965.
Bissell, D. (2016). Moving with others: The sociality of the railway journey. In P. Vannini (Ed.). The cultures of alternative mobilities: Routes less travelled (pp. 55-71). Routledge.
Brown, K. M., & Lackova P. (2020). Mobile video methods and wearable cameras. In P. Vannini (Ed.). The Routledge international handbook of ethnographic film and video (pp. 237-247). Routledge.
Burrows, D., & O'Sullivan, S. (2014). The sinthome/Z-points relation or art as non-schizoanalysis. In I. Buchanan, & L. Collins (Eds.). Deleuze and the schizoanalysis of visual art (pp. 253-278). Bloomsbury Academic.
Cimini, A. (2010). Gilles Deleuze and the musical Spinoza. In B. Hulse, & N. Nesbitt (Eds.). Sounding the virtual: Gilles Deleuze and the theory and philosophy of music (pp. 129-144). Ashgate.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? Columbia Univ. Press.
Doel, M. A., & Clarke, D. B. (2019). Through a net darkly: Spatial expression from glossematics to schizoanalysis. In T. Jellis, J. Gerlach, & J. D. Dewsbury (Eds.). Why Guattari?
A liberation of cartographies, ecologies and politics (pp. 19-33). Routledge.
Ellenzweig, S., & Zammito, J. H. (Eds.). (2017). The new politics of materialism: History, philosophy, science. Taylor & Francis.
Fisch, M. (2018). An anthropology of the machine: Tokyo's commuter train network. Univ. of Chicago Press.
Gad, C., Jensen, C. B., & Winthereik, B. R. (2015). Practical ontology: Worlds in STS and anthropology. Nature Culture, 3, 67-86.
Genosko, G. (Ed.) (1996). The Guattari reader. Blackwell Publishers.
Genosko, G. (2002). Félix Guattari: An aberrant introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Guattari, F. (1984). Molecular revolution: Psychiatry and politics. Puffin Books.
Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Indiana Univ. Press.
Guattari, F. (2005). The three ecologies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Guattari, F. (2009). Soft subversions: Texts and interviews (1977-1985). Semiotext (e).
Guattari, F. (2010). The machinic unconscious: Essays in schizoanalysis. Semiotext (e).
Guattari, F. (2013). Schizoanalytic cartographies. Bloomsbury.
Guattari, F. (2015). Psychoanalysis and transversality: Texts and interviews 1955-1971. Semiotext (e).
Harvey, P., & Knox, H. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Cornell Univ. Press.
Harvey, P., Jensen, C. B., & Morita, A. (Eds.). (2016). Infrastructures and social complexity
A companion. Taylor & Francis.
Jensen, C. B., & Morita, A. (Eds.) (2019). Multiple nature-cultures, diverse anthropologies. Berghahn Books.
Kirsch, S. (2013). Cultural geography I: Materialist turns. Progress in Human Geography, 37(3), 433-441.
Kirsch, S. (2014). Cultural geography II: Cultures of nature (and technology). Progress in Human Geography, 38(5), 691-702.
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Univ. of California Press.
Kohn, E. (2015). Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 311-327.
Kristensen, S. (2016). Flesh and the machine: Towards a transversal ontology with Merleau-Ponty and Guattari. Chiasmi International, 18, 169-182.
Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455-485.
Kusters, A. (2017). When transport becomes a destination: Deaf spaces and networks on the Mumbai suburban trains. Journal of Cultural Geography, 34(2), 170-193.
Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327-343.
Larsen, J. (2019). ‘Running on sandcastles': Energising the rhythmanalyst through non-representational ethnography of a running event. Mobilities, 14(5), 561-577.
Melitopoulos, A., & Lazzarato, M. (2012). Machinic animism. Deleuze Studies, 6(2), 240-249.
Merriman, P. (2014). Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities, 9(2), 167-187.
Millington, N. (2018). Producing water scarcity in São Paulo, Brazil: The 2014-2015 water crisis and the binding politics of infrastructure. Political Geography, 65, 26-34.
O'Sullivan, S., & Zepke, S. (Eds.) (2008). Deleuze, Guattari and the production of the new. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Paterson, M., & Glass, M. R. (2020). Seeing, feeling, and showing ‘bodies-in-place': Exploring reflexivity and the multisensory body through videography. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(1), 1-24.
Polese, A. (2006). Border-crossing as a strategy of daily survival: The Odessa-Chisinau elektrichka. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 24(1), 28-37.
Raffles, H. (2010). Insectopedia. Vintage.
Roberts, T. (2019). Resituating post-phenomenological geographies: Deleuze, relations and the limits of objects. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(3), 542-554.
Salazar, G., Irarrázaval, F., & Fonck, M. (2017). Exploring intermediate cities in Latin America: mixed mobile methods for mobility assessment in Villarrica, Chile. The Geographical Journal, 183(3), 247-260.
Schweitzer, P., & Povoroznyuk, O. (2019). A right to remoteness? A missing bridge and articulations of indigeneity along an East Siberian railroad. Social Anthropology, 27(2), 236-252.
Schweitzer, P., Povoroznyuk, O., & Schiesser, S. (2017). Beyond wilderness: Towards an anthropology of infrastructure and the built environment in the Russian North. The Polar Journal, 7(1), 58-85.
Simpson, P. (2011). ‘So, as you can see...': Some reflections on the utility of video methodologies in the study of embodied practices. Area, 43(3), 343-352.
Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 231-246.
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton Univ. Press.
Vannini, P. (2011). The techne of making a ferry: A non-representational approach to passengers' gathering taskscapes. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(5), 1031-1036.
Vannini, P., Hodson, J., & Vannini, A. (2009). Toward a technography of everyday life: The methodological legacy of James W. Carey's ecology of technoculture as communication. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 9(3), 462-476.
Watts, L. & Urry, J. (2008). Moving methods, travelling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(5), 860-874.
Wilson, H. F. (2017). On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 451-471.
