Commenting on Pindar (Pyth. 5.10–11): Does Castor “flood the hearth” or “ignite the hearth”?

Authors

  • O. L. Akhunova Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-89-100

Keywords:

Pindar, Pythian odes, semantics, metaphor, imagery

Abstract

The task of this short paper is to show, using the example of v. 10–11 of Pindar’s Fifth Pythian Ode, that the semantics of the verb καταιθύσσω is misunderstood, and that this erroneous understanding has been recorded in almost all dictionaries, starting with the dictionary LSJ. As a result, the meaning of many poetic contexts, where the verb αἰθύσσω and its variants with prefixes appear, is distorted, losing the metaphor embedded in them. Analysis of the etymology and semantics of the group αἰθύσσω — ἀναιθύσσω — διαιθύσσω — καταιθύσσω — παραιθύσσω leads to the conclusion that “fire/ignition” is a basic seme of the semantic spectrum of the verb αἰθύσσω and its prefixal variants. Being rarely used, verbs of this group gradually lost their connection with the idea of fire-ignition, and modern dictionaries are guided by the meaning that ancient commentators saw in this group of verbs. My interpretation of the semantics of the verb makes it possible to see the image that stands behind the metaphorical description of Castor’s favor to King Arcesilaus: it is likened to kindling a fire in the hearth, and the prefix κατα- indicates that the action is performed from top to bottom, that is, from a height. And in this case, the translation of vv. 10–11 is as follows: “he ignites your blessed hearth with serenity”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Гаспаров 1980 — Пиндар. Вакхилид. Оды. Фрагменты / Пер., ст. и коммент. М. Л. Гаспарова. М.: Наука, 1980. (Лит. памятники).

Парин 1999 — Сапфо. Фиас, подруги, соперницы / [Пер. А. Парина] Эллинские поэты VIII–III вв. до н. э. Эпос. Элегия. Ямбы. Мелика. М.: Ладомир, 1999. С. 327–331.

Coleridge 1910 — The plays of Euripides / Trans. by E. P. Colridge. Vol. 1. London: George Bell & Sons, 1910.

Drachmann 1997 — Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina / Recensuit A. B. Drachmann. Vol. 2. Stutgardiae et Lipsiae: In aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1997.

Irigoin 2002 — Bacchylide. Dithyrambes. Épinicies. Fragments / Texte établi par J. Irigoin, trad. par J. Duchemin et L. Bardollet. Paris: Les Belles Lettres (CUF), 2002.

Jebb 1905 — Bacchylides. The poems and fragments / Ed. by R. C. Jebb. Cambridge: At the Univ. Press, 1905.

Murray 1905 — The Trojan women of Euripides / Trans. by G. Murray. London: Ballantyne Hanson & Co, 1905.

Race 1997 — Pindar. Olympian Odes. Pythian Odes / Ed. by W. H. Race. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard Univ. Press, 1997.

Snell, Maehler 1984 — Pindari carmina cum fragmentis. Pars 1: Epinicia / Post B. Snell, edidit H. Maehler. Leipzig: BSB B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, 1984. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana).

Sandys, J. (Intro., English Trans.) (1915). The odes of Pindar: including the principal fragments. William Heinemann; The Macmillan Co.

Turyn, A. (1942). The Sapphic ostracon. Transactions and proceedings of the American Philological Association, 73, 308–318.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Akhunova O.L. Commenting on Pindar (Pyth. 5.10–11): Does Castor “flood the hearth” or “ignite the hearth”? // Shagi. 2024. Vol. 10, no. 2. P. 89–100. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-89-100