Rhetoric in the service of politics: Panegyric and its role in the era of the Second Sophistic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2017-3-4-224-233Keywords:
rhetoric, old Greek oratory, Second Sophistic, epideictic eloquence, “welcoming” speeches, Aelius AristidesAbstract
The fourishing of oratory in the East of the Roman Empire during the 2nd–3rd centuries A.D. is usually called the Second Sophistic — by analogy with the sophistical movement in Greece, mainly in Athens, in the 5th century B.C. The “teachers of wisdom” managed then to make rhetoric the most important instrument of political infuence on the life of the state and the society as a whole. The union of politics and rhetoric, state power and freedom of expression led to results that were completely unexpected and colossal in their signifcance: the fourishing of Athenian democracy, on the one hand, and the emergence of masterpieces in the feld of verbal creativity, on the other. The speeches of such outstanding orators as Isocrates, Demosthenes, and others had a tremendous impact on public opinion and state policy. In the Roman Empire, mainly in the cities of Asia Minor, where Greek cultural infuence predominated from time immemorial, the approach of the so-called “golden age of the Antonines” with its well-designed system of administration in the provinces and the extension of civil rights and freedoms of the population also contributed to a signifcant cultural rise in society. This was refected, frstly, in the appearance of a huge number of speakers and rhetoricians — sophists who traveled from city to city giving public recitations or reading lectures on rhetoric. Sophists made speeches on a variety of topics, and the most prominent of them were often granted the honorable right to deliver a solemn speech at a citywide celebration or a welcoming speech on the occasion of the arrival in the city of representatives of the Roman authorities and even the emperor himself. A typical example involves the two surviving “Smyrnean orations” by Aelius Aristides: their fame secured this orator a solid place among the classics of late Greek eloquence. Both speeches are addressed to Roman offcials and demonstrate well the close cultural and political ties between the Roman authorities and the Greek intellectual elite in the 2nd century A.D., strengthened, apparently, thanks to repeated trips of emperors to the East. This gives us reason to view the latter as the political underpinning of the so-called “phenomenon” of the Second Sophistic.Downloads
References
Behr C. A. Aelius Aristides and The Sacred Tales. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert, 1968.
Boulanger A. Aelius Aristides et la sophistique dans la province d'Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère. Paris: De Boccard, 1923.
Bürchner L. Smyrna // Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Bd. III A. 1927. Sp. 730-764.
Burgess T. C. Epideictic literature // University of Chicago Studies in classical philology. Vol. 3. 1902. Р. 87-263.
Сrusius O. Enkomion // Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Bd. V. 1905. Sp. 2581-2583.
Day J. W. The glory of Athens. The popular tradition as reflected in the Panathenaicus of Aelius Aristides. Chicago: Are, 1980.
Graindor P. Athénes sous Hadrien. Le Caire: Imprimerie Nationale; Boulac, 1934.
Halfmann H. Itinera principum. Geschichte und Typologie der Kaiserreisen im römischen Reich. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1986 (Heidelberger althistorische Beiträge und epigraphische Studien; Bd. 2).
Klein R. (1981). Die Romrede des Aelius Aristides. Darmstadt: WBG, 1981.
Millar F. The emperor in the Roman world. London: Bristol Classical Press, 1989.
MacCormack S. G. Latin prose panegyrics: Tradition and discontinuity in the Later Roman Empire // Revue des Études Augustiniennes. Vol. 22. 1976. P. 29-77.
MacCormack S. G. Art and ceremony in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1981.
Oliver J. H. The ruling power. A study of the Roman Empire in the second century after Christ through the Roman Oration of Aelius Aristides. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1953 (TAPhS, new ser., vol. 43, pt. 4).
Oliver J. H. The civilizing power. A study of the Panathenaic discourse of Aelius Aristides against the background of literature and cultural conflict, with text, translation and commentary. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1968 (TAPhS, new ser., vol. 58, pt. 1).
Payr T. Enkomion // Reallexicon für Antike und Christentum. Bd. 5. 1962. Sp. 332-343.
Pernot L. Les topoi de l'éloge chez Ménandros le Rhéteur // Revue des Études Grecques. Vol. 99. 1982. P. 33-53. (In French).
Pernot L. La rhétorique de l'èloge dans le monde gréco-romain: 2 vols. Paris: Institut d'études augustiniennes, 1992 (Collection des études augustiniennes. Série Antiquité; 137-138).
Rohde E. Die asianische Rhetorik und zweite Sophistik // Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. Neue Folge. Bd. 41. 1886. S. 170-190.
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff U. von. Der Rhetor Aristides // Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Bd. 28. Fasc. 5. S. 333-353.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN XMREHZ
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)