Images of animals from Historia Naturalis in political rhetoric of Late Antiquity: Blossius Aemilius Dracontius’ lion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2020-6-1-158-167Abstract
The main subject of the paper is the representation of Pliny’s ‘bestiary’ in Late Antiquity. In particular, it concerns the image of the lion depicted in Book 8 of Historia Naturalis as the most gentle and merciful of carnivores. I try to argue that a Carthaginian 5th century author, Blossius Aemilius Dracontius, used this image to construct political allegories, but not in a complimentary way; rather, it served as a kind of ‘camouflage’, an instrument to disguise the criticism present in his texts, which were, in essence, political pamphlets. The main idea is that texts of different genres, written by Dracontius at different times, can be treated as one system, constructed by using of cross-cutting terms, characters and images in each poem. The image of a lion is one of the most popular in this sequence: it appears both in early works by the Carthaginian poet (dedication to Felicianus Grammaticus, known as Romulea 1; Controversia de statua viri fortis) and in later ones (Satisfactio; De Raptu Helenae; Orestis Tragoedia). Analysis of intertextual links shows that with the help of this image Dracontius tried to depict Vandal kings as rude and bloodthirsty creatures - not directly, because this could be too dangerous, but rather implicitly: the lion image, traditionally associated with Pliny’s description, served here as a kind of mask.Downloads
References
Bright, D. F. (1987). The miniature epic in Vandal Africa. Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.
Bright, D. F. (1999). The chronology of the poems of Dracontius. Classica et Mediaevalia. Revue danoise de philologie et d'histoire, 50, 193-206.
Edwards, M. J. (2004). Dracontius the African and the Fate of Rome. Latomus, 63(1), 151-160.
Kaufmann, H. (2005). Dracontius, Romul. 10 (Medea). Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Heidelberg: Winter. (In German and Latin).
Marrόn, G. (2017). Furor impius / non impia ira. Comparaciones de hombres con leones en la obra de Blosio Emilio Draconcio. Euphrosyne: Revista de filología clássica, 45, 80-95. (In Spanish).
Merrills, A. (2004). The perils of panegyric: The lost poem of Dracontius and its consequences. In A. Merrills (Ed.). Vandals, Romans and Berbers: New perspectives on Late Antique North Africa, 145-162. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Obermeier, A. (1999). The History and anatomy of auctorial self-criticism in the European Middle Ages. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Romano, D. (1959). Studi Draconziani. Palermo: U. Manfredi. (In Italian).
Shanzer, D. A. (1986). A philosophical and literary commentary on Martianus Capella's De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii, Book 1. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Schetter, W. (1990). Zur ‘Satisfactio' des Dracontius. Hermes, 118(1), 90-117. (In German).
Simons, R. (2005). Dracontius und der Mythos: Christliche Weltsicht und pagane Kultur in der ausgehenden Spätantike. Leipzig: De Gruyter. (In German).
Tizzoni, M. (2012). The poems of Dracontius in their Vandalic and Visigothic context. Leeds: The Univ. of Leeds.
Van Zyl Smit, B. (2010). The amorous queen and the country bumpkin: Clytaemestra and Egistus in Dracontius' Orestis Tragoedia. Akroterion, 55, 25-36.
Wasyl, A. M. (2011). Genres rediscovered: Studies in Latin Miniature epic, love elegy, and epigram of the Romano-Barbaric age. Kraków: Jagiellonian Univ. Press.
