Со-авторизация, но не соавторство: приключения транскрипта в цифровую эпоху
Ключевые слова:
со-авторизация, цифровые трансформации полевого исследования, транскрипт, открытый доступ, процедуры согласования (member checking), обнинский проектАннотация
Автор использует вызов дигитализации социального знания для того, чтобы обнаружить лакуны и неотрефлексированные области в теории и технологии качественного исследования. Основное внимание уделено процедуре согласования с информантом транскрипта интервью в преддверии размещения этих данных в открытом электронном архиве. В статье пересматривается классическое представление о расшифровке интервью как стабильном тексте, находящемся в безраздельной власти исследователя, и проблематизируются техники подготовки транскрипта эпохи цифровой коллаборации. Для описания прав на текст и ответственностей за него, разделяемых и дигитально распределяемых между исследователем и информантом на стадии подготовки электронной публикации, вводится концепт «со-авторизация». Со-авторизация рассматривается как прием и эффект цифровых трансформаций научной работы социального исследователя.Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Аверинцев С. Риторика и истоки европейской литературной традиции. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1996.
Жижек С. Возвышенный объект идеологии/Пер. В. Сафронова. М.: Худ. журнал, 1999.
Касаткина А. К. Исследовательское интервью и открытый электронный архив: трансформация метода, новая технология представления, архив как место встречи//Векторы развития современной России. От формирования ценностей к изобретению традиций. Материалы XIII Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. молодых ученых. 11-12 апреля 2014 года/Под общ. ред. М. Г. Пугачевой. М.: Дело, 2015. С. 238-249.
Atkinson P., Silverman D. (1997). Kundera's immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 3. 1997. P. 304-327.
Bloor M. Techniques of validation in qualitative research: A critical commentary/Context and method in qualitative research/Ed. by G. Miller, R. Dingwall. London: SAGE, 1997. P. 37-50.
Bok S. The limits of confidentiality//Hastings Center Report. Vol. 13. No. 1. 1983. P. 24-31.
Borgman Ch. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.
Boschma G., Yonge O., Mychajlunow L. (2003). Consent in oral history interviews: Unique challenges//Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 129-135.
Bourdieu P. Understanding//Theory, Culture and Society. Vol. 13. No. 2. 1997. P. 17-37.
Briggs C. L. Interviewing, power/knowledge and social inequality//Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns/Ed. by J. A. Holstein, J. F. Gubrium. London: SAGE, 2005. P. 495-506.
Buchbinder E. (2011). Beyond checking: Experiences of the validation interview//Qualitative Social Work. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 106-122.
Bucholtz M. The politics of transcriptions//Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 32. 2000. P. 1439-1465.
Burman E. Minding the gap: Positivism, psychology, and the politics of qualitative methods//Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 53. 2000. P. 785-801.
Cain P. The limits of confidentiality//Nursing Ethics. Vol. 5. No. 2. 1998. P. 158-165.
Carlson J. Avoiding traps in member checking//The Qualitative Report. Vol. 15. No. 5. 2010. P. 1102-1113.
Cho J., Trent A. Validity in qualitative research//Qualitative Research. Vol. 6. No. 3. 2006. P. 319-340.
Clandinin D., Connelly F. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2000.
Corbin J., Morse J. The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 9. No. 3. 2003. P. 335-354.
Creswell J. W., Miller D. L. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry//Theory into Practice. Vol. 39. No. 3. 2000. P. 124-130.
Denzin N. K. The experiential text and the limits of visual understanding//Educational Theory. Vol. 45. 1995. P. 7-18.
Dicks B., Mason B., Coffey A., Atkinson P. Qualitative research and hypermedia: Ethnography for the digital age. London: SAGE, 2005.
Dunaway D. Transcription: Shadow or reality?//Oral History Review. Vol. 12. 1984. P. 113-117.
Easton K. L., McComish J. F., Greenberg R. Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription//Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 10. 2000. P. 703-707.
Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research/Ed. by J. A. Edwards, M. D. Lampert. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993.
Forbat L., Henderson J. Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants//Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 15. 2005. P. 114-1128.
Frisch M. A shared authority: Essays on the craft and meaning of oral and public history. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1990.
Frisch M. Oral history and the digital revolution//The oral history reader/Ed. by R. Perks, A. Thomson. London: Routledge, 2006. P. 102-114.
Giordano J., O'Reilly M., Taylor H., Dogra N. Confidentiality and autonomy: The challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity//Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 264-275.
Grundy A., Pollon D., McGinn M. The participant as transcriptionist: Methodological advantages of a collaborative and inclusive research practice//International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 2. No. 2. 2003. P. 1-19.
Gubrium E., Koro-Ljungberg M. Contending with border making in the social constructionist interview//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 11. No. 5. 2005. P. 689-715.
Hagens V., Dobrow M. J., Chafe R. (2009). Interviewee transcript review: Assessing the impact on qualitative research//BMC Medical Research Methodology. Vol. 9. 2009. P. 47-56.
Halcomb E., Davidson P. Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary?//Applied Nursing Research. Vol. 19. 2006. P. 38-42.
Karnieli-Miller O., Strier R., Pessach L. Power relations in qualitative interview//Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 19. No. 2. 2009. P. 279-289.
Koelsch L. Reconceptualizing the member-check interview//International Journal of Qualitative Method. Vol. 12. 2013. P. 168-179.
Kvale S. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: SAGE, 1996.
Kvale S. Dominance through interviews and dialogue//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 12. No. 3. 2006. P. 480-500.
Lane V. Typists' influences on transcription: Aspects of feminist nursing epistemic rigour//Nursing Inquiry. Vol. 3. 1996. P. 159-166.
Langeiller K. M. Personal narrative//Encyclopedia of life writing: Autobiographical and biographical forms/Ed. by M. Jolly. Vol. 2. London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001. P. 699-701.
Lapadat J. Problematizing transcription: Purpose, paradigm and quality//International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Vol. 3. No. 3. 2000. P. 203-219.
Lapadat J., Lindsay A. Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positioning//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 5. 1999. P. 64-86.
Leavy P. Oral history: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.
Lincoln Y., Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1985.
MacLean L., Meyer M., Estable A. Improving accuracy of transcripts//Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 14. 2004. P. 113-123.
MacWhinney B., Snow C. The wheat and the chaff of four confusions regarding CHILDES//Journal of Child Language. Vol. 19. P. 435-458.
Mauthner N. S., Doucet A. Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again//Sociology. Vol. 42. No. 5. P. 971-985.
Mays N., Pope G. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research//British Medical Journal. Vol. 1. 2000. P. 114-116.
McLellan E., MacQueen K., Neidig J. Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription//Field Methods. Vol. 15. No. 1. 2003. P. 63-84.
Mero-Jaffe I. “Is that what I said?” Interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research//International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Vol. 10. No. 3. 2011. P. 231-247.
Meyer E., Schroeder R. Knowledge machines: Digital transformations of the sciences and humanities. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.
Mondada L. Commentary: Transcript variation and the indexicality of transcribing practices//Discourse Studies. Vol. 9. No. 6. 2007. P. 809-821.
Moore N. (Re)Using qualitative data?//Sociological Research Online. Vol. 12. No. 3. URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html.
Murray-Rust P. Open Data in science//Serials Review. Vol. 34. No. 1. 2008. P. 52-64.
Norris S. The implication of visual research for discourse analysis: Transcription beyond language//Visual Communication. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2002. P. 97-121.
Ochs E. Transcription as theory//Developmental pragmatics/Ed. by E. Ochs, B. Schieffelin. New York: Academic Press, 1979. P. 43-71.
Onwuegbuzie A., Leech N. Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron?//Quality and Quantity. Vol. 41. No. 2. 2007. P. 233-249.
Page R., Samson Y., Crockett M. Reporting ethnography to informants//Acts of inquiry in qualitative research/Ed. by B. Brizuelf, J. Stewart, R. Carrillo, J. Berger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review, 2000. P. 321-352.
Perakyla A. Reliability and validity in research based on tapes and transcripts//Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice/Ed. by D. Silverman. London: SAGE, 1997. P. 201-220.
Poland B. Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 1. No. 3. 1995. P. 290-310.
Pomerantz A., Fehr B. Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices//Discourse as social interaction/Ed. by T. A. Van Dijk. London: SAGE, 1997. P. 65-91.
Potter J. (1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analyzing naturally occurring talk//Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. Vol. 1. 1997. P. 144-160.
Progler J. Choices in editing oral history: The distillation of Dr. Hiller//Oral History Review. Vol. 19. No. 1-2. 1991. P. 1-16.
Psathas G., Anderson T. The “practices” of transcription in conversation analysis//Semiotica. Vol. 78. 1990. P. 75-99.
Rhodes C. Ghostwriting research: Positioning researcher in the interview text//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 511-525.
Rice-Lively M. Wired warp and woof: An ethnographic study of a networking class//Internet Research. Vol. 4. No. 4. 1994. P. 20-35.
Riessman C. Qualitative studies in social work research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1993.
Ritchie D. Doing oral history. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2015.
Ryen A. Ethical issues//Qualitative research practice/Ed. by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, D. Silverman.), London: SAGE. 2004. P. 230-247.
Sandelowski M. Focus on qualitative methods: Notes on transcription//Research in Nursing and Health. Vol. 17. No. 4. 1994. P. 311-314.
Scheurich J. A postmodern critique of research interviewing//Qualitative Studies in Education. Vol. 8. 1995. P. 239-252.
Schrum L. Framing the debate: Ethical research in the information age//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 1. No. 3. 1995. P. 311-326.
Schwandt T. The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry. London: SAGE, 2007.
Policy trends and academic controversies in UK and Sweden//Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 14. No. 2. URL: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1872.
Workflows for e-Science: Scientific workflows for grids/Ed. by I. J. Taylor, E. Deelman, D. B. Gannon, M. Shields. London: Springer, 2007.
ten Have P. Methodological issues in conversation analysis//Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 23-51.
Thompson P. The voice of the past: Oral history. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000.
Thomson A. Introduction: Sharing authority: Oral history and the collaborative process//The Oral History Review. Vol. 30. No. 1. 2003. P. 23-26.
Thomson A. Four paradigm transformations in oral history//The Oral History Review. Vol. 34. No. 1. 2007. P. 49-70.
Tilley S. “Challenging” research practices: Turning a critical lens on the work of transcription//Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 9. No. 5. 2003. P. 750-773.
Turnbull A. Collaboration and censorship in the oral history interview//International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 15-34.
Vahasantanen K., Saarinen J. The power dance in the research interview: Manifesting power and powerlessness//Qualitative Research. Vol. 13. No. 5. 2003. P. 493-510.
West C. Ethnography and orthography: A (modest) methodological proposal//Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Vol. 25. No. 3. 1996. P. 327-352.
Yow V. Recording oral history: A guide for the humanities and social sciences. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, 2005.
Zeitlin D. Anthropology in and of the archives. Possible futures and contingent pasts. Archives as anthropological surrogates//Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 41. 2012. P. 461-480.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Как цитировать
Коды статьи
- EDN XAHQCB
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
