Hasta, mudra, viniyoga. Hand gestures in Indian culture: Problems of origin and generation of meaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2019-5-4-216-238Keywords:
gestures, Indian performing arts, dance, drama, ritualAbstract
Gesticulation is one of the most important distinguishing features of Indian expressiveness in general, and performing culture in particular. Expressiveness is characteristic of all Indian public life, and it is most clearly manifested in rituals, performances, demonstrations, in public actions of both one person and whole groups. The article explores the gesture as a complex cultural category in Indian culture, connecting the area of bodily postures, movements with the domain of meanings. The focus is on gesturing systems, above all, hand gestures, in which there are a kind of “dictionaries” or “glossaries” of symbolic gestures (hasta-mudra) and a “grammar” — the skills of using them (viniyoga) to create an artistic text, to implement a dramatic plot. Questions are posed regarding the origin and generation of meaning within the framework of Indian theatrical arts. The concepts of mudra and hasta are analyzed in the situation of ritual and performing arts, theater and dance. The author describes two ways of using hand gestures — as a sign, and as a symbol. The patterns underlying the practice of using gestures (viniyoga) appear to be the main point that prescribes the making of meaning. The author comes to the conclusion that the domain of mastering the art of gesture in Indian performing culture is an extremely old and well-structured discipline. It achieved the greatest integrity and harmony in Hindu rituals, primarily in Tantric rites. Here, the term mudra was formed and began to be applied systematically (along with such terms as tantra, yantra, mantra, which possessed special meaning in Tantric practices). It has two meanings — both the position of the whole body and the gesture of hands. At the same time, in many respects independently (although in some cases, apparently, not without interconnection), a “grammar” took shape in the field of theatrical-dramatic art — gestures of the actor and dancer, — and in iconography — canonical sculptural images of gods, heroes, etc. In theatrical expression, hand gestures were originally designated by the concept of hasta (literally “hand”), and the system of meaningful hand gestures was called hastabhinaya. Over time, in all these areas, as well as in various schools and areas of yoga, the term mudra began to be used actively. This, among other things, turned out to be a method of sanskritization, cultural elevation, social recognition, elevation of these areas of bodily action, raising them to a level close to the ritual. In scenic practice, however, not all the gestures of the hands of an actor and a dancer are wise signs; a kind of “emancipation of gesture” lies at the basis of the formation of all abstract compositions, the meanings of which the viewer himself can freely “read”. Acknowledgements. This article is a part of a research program of Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Science. The fieldwork material collected in frame of research project by Dr. Svetlana Ryzhakova “Possession, devotion, performance: borders and interconnections of personal self-possession, worship and artistic experience in Indian artistic traditions” supported by Russian Foundation for Fundamental Researches, grant № 18-09-00389.Downloads
References
Anand M. R. The Indian theatre. London: Dennis Dobson, 1950.
Awasthi S. Performance traditions in India. New Delhi: National Book Trust, 2001.
The body in India: Ritual, transgression, performativity / Hrsg. von М. Axel, Ch. Wulf. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2009. (Paragrana. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Historische Antropologie; Bd. 18. Heft 1).
Banerjee J. N. The development of Hindu iconography. 5th ed. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharal, 2002. (1st ed.: 1956).
Bhattacharyya B. The Indian Buddhist iconography: Mainly based on the Sādhanamālā and cognate Tāntric texts of rituals. 2nd ed., rev. and enl. Calcutta: Firma K. L. Mukhopadhay, 1968. (1st ed.: 1958).
Bhattacharyya N. N. History of the Tantric religion: An historical, ritualistic and philosophical study. 2nd rev. ed. New Delhi: Manohar, 2005.
Bose M. Movement and mimesis: The idea of dance in sanskritic Tradition. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
Bunce F. W. Mudras in Buddhist and Hindu practices: An iconographic consideration. 2nd ed. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld (P) Ltd., 2009.
Coomaraswamy A. K. Hands and feet in Indian art // The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs. Vol. 24. No. 130. 1914. P. 204-211.
Coomaraswamy A. K. The transformation of nature in art. New York: Dover, 1956. (Reprint; 1st ed.: 1934).
Coomaraswamy A. K. History of Indian and Indonesian art. New York: Dover, 1965. (Reprint; 1st ed.: 1927).
Coomaraswamy A. K. The mirror of gestures: being the Abhinaya darpana of Nandikesvara. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1997.
Dalmia V. Poetics, plays, and performance: The politics of modern Indian theatre. New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.
Nandikesvara's Abhinayadarpanam. A manual of gesture and posture used in ancient Indian dance and drama / Ed. by M. Ghosh. 5th print. Calcutta: Manisha, 1992.
Rao T. A. Elements of Hindu iconography, New Delhi: DK Publishers, 1990. (Reprint; 1st ed.: 1914).
Harris J. G. Masala Shakespeare: How a Firangi writer became Indian. New Delhi: Aleph, 2018.
Theatres of India: A concise companion / Ed. by A. Lal. New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009.
Liebert G. Iconographic dictionary of the Indian religion. Leyden: Brill, 1976.
Lokesh Chandra, Sharada Rani. Mudras in Japan: Symbolic hand-postures in Japanese Mantrayana or the esoteric Buddhism of the Shingon denomination. New Delhi: Sharada Rani, 1978.
Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni: Text, сommentary of Abhinava Bhāratī by Abhinavaguptācārya and English translation / Ed. by P. Kumar, М. М. Ghosh. Vols. 1-4. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass, 2006.
Neog M. Mudras in the Kalika-purana // Sangeet Natak. 1977 Vol. 45. July-September. P. 5-7.
Padoux A. The body in Tantric ritual: The case of the mudras // The Sanskrit tradition and Tantrism / Ed. by T. Goudriaan. Leiden: Brill, 1990. P. 66-76.
Roy R. Neo-classical Odissi dance. New Delhi: Harman Publishing House, 2009.
Sinha B. Encyclopaedia of Indian theatre. Vols. 1-3. Delhi: Raj, 2000.
Smith R. Questions regarding the word mudra: A preliminary survey of gestures on Indian icons and their designation // Asianart.com. Аrticles. 2015. September 9. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/44f8/bcfa65604b86bfc158f1d4e85e3577ea2700.pdf.
Srinivas M. N. Religion and society among the Coorgs of South India. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.
Tarlekar G. H. Studies in the Nāt.yaśāstra, with special reference to the Sanskrit drama in performance. 2nd ed., rev. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass, 1991.
Varadpande M. L. History of Indian theatre. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications, 1987.
Vatsyayan K. Indian classical dance. New Delhi: Publication Division
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting; Government of India, 1974.
Vatsyayan K. Traditional Indian theatre: Multiple streams. New Delhi: National Book Trust, 2007. (1st ed. 1980).