Rhetorical strategies of normalization in dream narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2020-6-4-126-140Keywords:
contrast structures, dreams, dream diaries, dream journals, dream reports, dream telling, everyday life, extraordinary events, normalizing devices, strangenessAbstract
The paper examines ways in which strange events, characters and details are described in dream reports. The author analyzes methods of constructing “strangeness” in dream narratives and compares them with the ones which are common in reports on extraordinary and paranormal events. It is demonstrated that several devices which include so-called “contrast structures” and “X-Y structures” might be employed in dream reports. X-Y structures provide mundane contrasts to extraordinary events, while contrast structures juxtapose wrong actions with descriptions of appropriate behavior. So, by applying the opposition of appropriate and inappropriate, and the opposition of extraordinary and mundane, these devices help to portray events as strange. Though these techniques might be used in dream reports, they could also be employed in other narratives, including reports on paranormal experiences or descriptions of behavior of mentally ill people. Their functions in various types of reports are similar; however, the use of these devices in dream narratives is substantially different in some respects. While reports on waking reality juxtapose normal and strange or fitting and wrong, dream reports juxtapose strange elements of a dream with the same elements as if they normally were in reality. Thus, in dream reports the opposition of normal and strange is closely connected with the opposition of waking reality and the dream.Downloads
References
Coulter, J. (1973). Approaches to insanity: A philosophical and sociological study. London: Martin Robertson.
Edwards, D., Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Georgaca, E. (2004) Factualization and plausibility in delusional discourse. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(1), 13-23.
Hak, T. (1998). "There are clear delusions". The production of a factual account. Human Studies, 21(4), 419-436.
Hayward, R., Wooffitt, R., Woods, C. (2015). The transgressive that: Making the world uncanny. Discourse Studies, 17(6), 703-723.
Hilbert, R. (2010). The anomalous foundations of dream telling: Objective solipsism and the problem of meaning. Human Studies, 33(1), 41-64.
Honig, A. S., Nealis, A. L. (2012). What do young children dream about? Early Child Development and Care, 182(6), 771-795.
Jefferson, G. (2004). "At first I thought": A normalizing device for extraordinary events. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 131-167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Malcolm, N. (1959). Dreaming. London: Routledge & Paul.
Mathes, J., Schredl, M. (2014). Analysis of a large sample of diary dreams - how typical are these typical dreams? Somnologie: Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin, 18(2), 107-112.
Ohashi, Y., Wooffitt, R., Jackson, C., Nixon, Y. (2013). Discourse, culture and extraordinary experiences: Observations from a comparative, qualitative analysis of Japanese and UK English accounts of paranormal phenomena. Western Journal of Communication, 77(4), 466-488.
Palmer, D. (2000). Identifying delusional discourse: Issues of rationality, reality and power. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22(5), 661-678.
Pollner, M. (1975). ‘The very coinage of your brain': The anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 5(3), 411-430.
Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
Potter, J., Hepburn, A. (2007). Discursive constructionism. In J. A. Holstein, J. F. Gubrium (Eds.). Handbook of constructionist research, 275-293. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
Potter, J., Wetherell, M. (1995). Discourse analysis. In J. S. Smith, R. Harré, L. Van Langenhove (Eds.). Rethinking methods in psychology, 80-92. London: Sage.
Revonsuo, A., Tarkko, K. (2002). Binding in dreams: The bizarreness of dream images and the unity of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(7), 3-24.
Rosen, M., Sutton, J. (2013). Self-representation and perspectives in dreams. Philosophy Compass, 8(11), 1041-1053.
Rosenhan, D. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179, 250-258.
Sacks, H. (1984). On doing "being ordinary". In J. M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (Eds.). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 413-429. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Shafton, A. (1995). Dream reader: Contemporary approaches to the understanding of dreams. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
Smith, D. Е. (1978). "K is Mentally Ill": The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12(1), 23-53.
St-Onge, M., Lortie-Lussier, M., Mercier, P., Grenier, J., De Koninck, J. (2005). Emotions in the diary and REM dreams of young and late adulthood women and their relation to life satisfaction. Dreaming, 15(2), 116-128.
Stockbridge, G., Wooffitt, R. (2019). Coincidence by design. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 437-454.
Sutton, J. (2009). Dreaming. In J. Symons, P. Calvo (Eds.). The Routledge companion to philosophy of psychology, 522-542. London: Routledge.
Windt, J. M. (2015). Dreaming: A conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Woods, C., Wooffitt, R. (2014). Telling the moment: Seeing a UFO. Narrative Inquiry, 24(2), 239-258.
Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London, UK: Sage.
