“Thick description” and the interpretation of cultures: How useful is Geertz's approach today in the study of Islam in Russia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2021-7-2-115-135Keywords:
Clifford Geertz, thick description, interpretation of cultures, anthropology of Islam, Talal asad, Muslim Studies, Islam in Russia, securitization of IslamAbstract
This article is devoted to rethinking the legacy of Clifford Geertz in the modern context and to the possibility of applying his approaches to the study of Islam and Muslims in Russia. We considered the basic principles of his methodology, based on the concepts of ‘thick description' and interpretation of cultures. Then we identified the main areas of criticism of Geertz's approaches among anthropologists, sociologists and specialists on Islam. From the 1980s, specialists in a wide range of fields of knowledge drew attention to the gap with the orientalist textual research tradition, the weak explanatory potential of ‘thick description', as well as total disregard for the political context, which ultimately led to an incorrect or at least limited interpretation of results obtained in the field. A trigger for revising this methodology in Russia was the publication of Interpretation of Cultures in 2004, and in the West - the death of Сlifford Geertz in 2006. Today, the interdisciplinarity and maximum adaptability of his approaches are of particular importance, including for Muslim studies in Russia. Applying ‘thick description' and interpretation of cultures will make it possible to overcome the current trend toward the securitization of Islam and thereby to expand the research agenda for studying the various practices of Muslim communities in Russia.Downloads
References
Асад Т. Идея антропологии ислама / Пер. с англ. // Islamology. Т. 7. № 1. 2017. C. 42-60.
Бустанов А., Рагозина С. Любовные письма, эпитафии и big data: новый взгляд на историю исламской культуры в России: [Подкаст] // Политвосток. 2020. 20 окт. URL: https://soundcloud.com/user-515071090/lyubovnye-pisma-epitafii-i-big-data-novyy-vzglyad-na-istoriyu-islamskoy-kultury-v-rossii.
Гирц К. Интерпретация культур / Пер. с англ. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004.
Елфимов А. Об антропологии и гуманитарных науках: несколько заметок о творчестве К. Гирца // Новое литературное обозрение. № 70. 2004. C. 50-62.
Каплун В. Л. Thick description как метод социальной науки: Гирц или Райл? // Давыдовские чтения: исторические горизонты теоретической социологии: Сб. науч. докл. симпозиума, 13-14 октября 2011 г. / Под ред. И. Ф. Девятко, Н. К. Орловой. М.: Ин-т социологии РАН, 2011. С. 35-55.
Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2004.
Никитичева А. О. Русские мусульмане Подмосковья: аспекты самопонимания и роль в общинах // Ислам в современном мире. Т. 16. № 3. 2020. С. 145-164.
Рагозина С. А. От "наблюдаемого ислама" к "дискурсивной традиции": о ключевых концепциях западной антропологии ислама // Этнографическое обозрение. 2020. № 4. С. 167-185.
Оливье Руа: "Для Франции ислам не представляет какой-то особой проблемы..". // Иностранная литература. 2006. № 9. C. 288-291.
Христофорова О. Между сциентизмом и романтизмом: Клиффорд Гирц о перспективах антропологии // Новое литературное обозрение. № 70. 2004. C. 32-39.
Юхневич Е. П., Каплун В. Л. Стриптиз "как призвание и профессия": к этнографии закрытых культурных сцен российского мегаполиса // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. Т. 16. №. 1. 2013. С. 124-147.
Addi L. Islam re-observed: Sanctity, Salafism, and Islamism // The Journal of North African Studies. Vol. 14. No. 3-4. 2009. P. 331-345.
Asad T. Anthropological conceptions of religion: Reflections on Geertz // Man. Vol. 18. No. 2. 1983. P. 237-259.
Asad T. Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1993.
Baeq D. S. Issues in the anthropology of Islam: Contributions and critics of Clifford J. Geertz // Journal of Arab and Islamic World Studies. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2014. P. 1-42.
Darnton R. In memoriam. Clifford Geertz (1926-2006) // Perspectives on History, 2007. Feb. 1. URL: https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/february-2007/in-memoriam-clifford-geertz.
El-Zein A. H. Beyond ideology and theology: The search for the anthropology of Islam // Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 6. 1977. P. 227-254.
Gablasova D., Brezina V., McEnery T. Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence // Language Learning. Vol. 67. No. S1. 2017. P. 155-179.
Geertz C. The impact of the concept of culture on the concept of man // New views of the nature of man / Ed. by J. R. Platt. Chicago; London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1965. P. 93-118.
Geertz C. Islam observed: Religious development in Indonesia and Morocco. Chicago; London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1968.
Geertz C. Negara: The theatre state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Interview with Clifford Geertz. Islam, modernity, nationalism / Interviewer S. Glebov // Ab Imperio. 2004. № 3. С. 91-111.
Gleaves J. Sport as meaningful narratives // Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. Vol. 44. No. 1. 2017. P. 29-43.
Huston S. Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002.
Huysmans J. The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London; New York, Routledge, 2006.
Keesing R. M. [et al.] Anthropology as interpretive quest [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology. Vol. 28. No. 2. 1987. P. 161-176.
Marranci G. Anthropology of Islam. New York: Berg, 2008.
"I don't do systems": An interview with Clifford Geertz / Interviewer A. Micheelsen // Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. Vol. 14. No. 1. 2002. P. 2-20.
Oparin D. Possession and exorcism in the Muslim migrant context // Ethnicities. Vol. 20. No. 4. 2020. P. 731-751.
Schilbrack K. Religion, models of, and reality: Are we through with Geertz? // Journal of the American Academy of Religion. Vol. 73. No. 2. 2005. P. 429-452.
Servaes J., Lie R. Toward a more interpretative communication research ‘framework': Television as a cultural system. An interpretation of Clifford Geertz // Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research. Vol. 22. No. 1. 1996. P. 42-49.
Shankman P. [et al.] The thick and the thin: On the interpretive theoretical program of Clifford Geertz [and comments and reply] // Current Anthropology. Vol. 25.
No. 3. 1984. P. 261-280.
Sorokopud S. Hermeneutical approaches in social philosophy and their ability for the analysis of Chinese society // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. Vol. 11. No. 6. 2013. P. 1721-1735.
