Easter online: Constructing co-presence in a mediatized ritual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2021-7-4-173-197Keywords:
easter, ritual, service, religion, co-presence, media, mediatization, SACRED space, kinestheticsAbstract
Epidemics of COVID-19 led to major lockdowns all over the world in 2020. This situation severely limited the possibility of a number of social activities, including religious gatherings. In Russia, the peak of the epidemic coincided with the central period in the Orthodox calendar - the last week of Lent and Easter. As the Patriarch blessed “stay-at-home” policies, churches were officially closed for everybody but the clergy and livestreams of services in social media were organized, while believers had to adapt swiftly to a new mode of co-presence in church by participating in services online. To do this, they had to make a choice between the places from which a livestream was organized, transform the space of their homes to accommodate the sacrality of the event, rethink the locality of their own body in being simultaneously at home and “in church”, manage communication with the priest, fellow parishioners and family members during Easter night. This involved not only formal decoration of homes but also subtle mechanisms of balancing authority within the network of sacred objects, gadgets and people. Based on digital ethnography (including participant observation online) and 40 in-depth interviews, the paper investigates how believers constructed and reflected the space of the Easter service in their homes, and presents three key strategies: synchronization, spacing and appellation to experience.Downloads
References
Дубовка Д. Г. В монастырь с миром. В поисках светских корней современной духовности. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в Санкт-Петербурге, 2020.
Кнорре Б. К., Мурашова А. А. "В начале было Слово…", а в конце будет число? Православие и антицифровой протест в России: с 1990-х до коронавируса // Мир России: Социология, этнология. Т. 30. № 2. 2021. С. 146-166.
Левкиевская Е. Е. Работа инсайдера в собственном сакральном поле: между научной отстраненностью и раздвоением личности // Антрополог глазами информанта / Информант глазами антрополога / Под ред. А. С. Архиповой, Н. Н. Рычковой. М.: Форум, 2015. С.14-24.
Лученко К. Цифровизация богослужебных практик в период пандемии коронавируса в контексте медиатизации православия // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. Т. 39. № 1. 2021. С. 39-57.
Мокроусов А. Культура-онлайн // Синий диван. № 24. 2020. С. 149-155.
Рязанова С. В. "Вот люди-то там стоят, а ты не можешь": посещение церкви в современном пермском православном сообществе. Пермь: Перм. гос. ин-т культуры, 2018.
Урбанович Р. "A z jakiej pan jest parafii?": о некоторых аспектах восприятия респондентом институциональной принадлежности антрополога // Антрополог глазами информанта / Информант глазами антрополога / Под ред. А. С. Архиповой, Н. Н. Рычковой. М.: Форум, 2015. С. 112-122.
Berger V. Phenomenology of online spaces: Interpreting late modern spatialities // Human Studies. Vol. 43. No. 4. 2020. P. 603-626.
Boden D., Molotch H. L. The compulsion of proximity // NowHere: Space, time and modernity / Ed. by R. Friedland, D. Boden. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1994. P. 257-286.
Campbell H. Challenges created by online religious networks // Journal of Media and Religion. Vol. 3. No. 2. 2004. P. 81-99.
Campbell H. Making space for religion in internet studies // The Information Society. Vol. 21. No. 4. 2005. P. 309-315.
Campbell H. Exploring religious community online: We are one in the network. New York: Peter Lang, 2005.
Campbell H., Golan O. Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the internet among bounded religious communities // Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 33. No. 5. 2011. P. 709-724.
Croes E., Antheunis M., Schouten A., Krahmer E. Teasing apart the effect of visibility and physical co-presence to examine the effect of CMC on interpersonal attraction // Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 55. 2016. Part A. P. 468-476.
David M., Millward P. Football's coming home? Digital reterritorialization, contradictions in the transnational coverage of sport and the sociology of alternative football broadcasts // British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 63. Νο. 2. 2012. P. 349-369.
Davie G. Vicarious religion: A methodological challenge // Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives / Ed. by N. Ammerman. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007. P. 21-35.
Dox D. Transformation in and from quarantine // Religion in quarantine: The future of religion in a post-pandemic world / Ed. by H. Campbell. College Station: Digital Religion Publications, 2020. P. 5-9.
Helland C. Religion online / online religion and virtual communitas // Religion on the Internet: Research prospects and promises / Ed. by J. K. Hadden, D. E. Cowan. London: JAI Press; Elsevier Science, 2000. P. 205-224.
Helland C. Online religion as lived religion: Methodological issues in the study of religious participation on the Internet // Online - Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2005. URL: https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/5823.
Howlett M. Looking at the ‘field' through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic // Qualitative Research. 2021. Forthcoming.
Low S. M. Embodied space(s): Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture // Space and Culture. Vol. 6. No. 1. 2003. P. 9-18.
Löw M. The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
Lundby K. Patterns of belonging in online/offline interfaces of religion // Information, Communication & Society. Vol. 14. No. 8. 2011. P. 1219-1235.
Massey D. B. For space. London: Sage Publications, 2005.
Mekuria R., Cesar P., Bulterman D. Digital TV: The effect of delay when watching football // EuroITV ‘12: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2012. P. 71-74.
O'Leary S. Cyberspace as sacred space: Communicating religion on computer networks // Journal of the American Academy of Religion. Vol. 64. No. 4. 1996. P. 781-808.
Osler L. Taking empathy online // Inquiry. Vol. 0. No. 0. 2021. P. 1-28.
Radcliffe M. Touch and the sense of reality // The hand, an organ of the mind: What the manual tells the mental / Ed. by Z. Radman (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013. P.131-158.
Ratz M., Pfeffel F., Kexel P., Kexel Chr. Second screen: User behaviour of spectators while watching football // Athens Journal of Sports. Vol. 3. No. 2. 2016. P. 119-128.
Souslov M. The Russian Orthodox Church and the pandemic: Problems, challenges, responses // Tidsskrift for Islamforskning. Vol.15. No. 2. 2021. P. 169-192.
Urry J. Mobility and proximity // Sociology. Vol. 36. No. 2. 2002. P. 255-274.
