FROM LOGIC TO NONSENSE: LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN’S PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE IN WALKING OF THOMAS BERNHARD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-291-304Keywords:
language criticism, tractatus logico-philosophicus, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Thomas Bernhard, philosophy and literatureAbstract
The article attempts to reveal the scale of influence of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus on the subject matter and writing method of Thomas Bernhard. On the basis of the novella Walking, published in 1970, we demonstrate that the issues raised by Wittgenstein at the beginning of the 20th century were of primary importance for Bernhard. The Austrian writer was interested not only in establishing the relationship between the world and language, but also in extrapolating this metaphysical problem to an understanding of the nature of literary creativity. Wittgenstein in his work asked the critical question about the possibility of adequate transmission of events by means of language and sought to explore its ontological and logical foundations. However, this idea of the philosopher receives an unusual refraction in the novella Walking. On the one hand, Bernhard casts doubt on Wittgenstein’s assumption about the initial isomorphism of words and objects and condemns his characters to endless wandering in the closed space of speech. On the other hand, in such a negative way he confirms the ideological core of the “linguistic turn”, and, in fact, that human existence is determined by language. Thus, literary exploration of themes of madness, suicide, the deceptiveness of reality, which in the logical continuum of the Tractatus are declared nonsensical, leads Bernhard’s narrative to an existential level.Agencies
Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 19-311-60010 «Этическое измерение языка: современная литература как способ подступиться к границам высказываемого».Downloads
References
Апель 2001 — Апель К.-О. Витгенштейн и проблема герменевтического понимания / Пер. с нем. Б. Скуратова // Апель К.-О. Трансформации философии. М: Логос, 2001. С. 61–102.
Витгенштейн 1994 — Витгенштейн Л. Логико-философский трактат / Пер. с нем. М. С. Козловой, Ю. А. Асеева // Витгенштейн Л. Философские работы. Ч. 1. М.: Гнозис, 1994. С. 1–73.
Коваль, Крюкова 2021 — Коваль О. А., Крюкова Е. Б. Витгенштейн как литературный персонаж. Часть I // Вопросы философии. 2021. № 3. С. 196–207.
Коваль, Крюкова 2022 — Коваль О. А., Крюкова Е. Б. Витгенштейн как литературный персонаж. Часть II // Вопросы философии. 2022. № 2. С. 169–179.
Монк 2018 — Монк Р. Людвиг Витгенштейн. Долг гения / Пер. с англ. А. Васильевой. М.: Изд. дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2018.
Bartmann 1991 — Bartmann Ch. Vom Scheitern der Studien. Das Schriftmotiv in Bernhards Romanen // Text + Kritik. Zeitschrift für Literatur. Heft 43. 3 Aufl. 1991. S. 22–29.
Doll 2003 — Doll J. “Die Grenzüberschreitung nach Steinhof”. Zu Thomas Bernhards Erzählung “Gehen” // Germanica. Vol. 32. 2003. P. 109–122. [Цит. по электрон. версии]. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/germanica/1851.
Gleber 1991 — Gleber A. “Auslöschung, Gehen”. Thomas Bernhards Poetik der Destruktion und Reiteration // Modern Austrian Literature. Vol. 24. No. 3/4. 1991. P. 85–97.
Knobloch 2021 — Knobloch J. “Nach und nach müssen wir alles ablehnen”: Hyperbolische Negativität bei Thomas Bernhard // German Life and Letters. Vol. 74. No. 1. 2021. S. 30–46.
Niccolini 2000 — Niccolini E. Der Spaziergang des Schriftstellers: Lenz von Georg Büchner; Der Spaziergang von Robert Walser; Gehen von Thomas Bernhard. Stuttgart; Weimar: Metzler, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kriukova E.B., Koval O.A.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.