The political relevance of a love story: Thomas Otway’s interpretation of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-4-303-321Keywords:
Thomas Otway, William Shakespeare, translation, adaptation, English theatreAbstract
The article is devoted to the reception of Shakespeare’s works in England in the last third of the 17th century, when Shakespeare’s plays were rewritten for the stage and adapted to the contemporary conditions and rules of English drama. Thomas Otway is considered one of the major translator-interpreters of Shakespeare plays into the language of his own modernity. The article examines how Otway treats the love story of Romeo and Juliet, namely, which elements he rewrites, which are left exactly as in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, and which are completely removed from the text of Otway’s play. Thus, the adaptation is regarded as a kind of translation within the framework of a single national tradition — from the language of the Elizabethan era to the language of the Restoration. Of particular importance are the changes made by Otway to the final episode of the play (the lovers get a chance to say goodbye to each other before their death, which does not exist in Shakespeare’s play). It is also important to mention that Otway’s play reflects the political situation of his epoch. Otway’s interpretation influenced all subsequent adaptations and European (German and French) translations of the 18th century.Downloads
References
Отуэй 2024 — Отуэй Т. Трагедии / Пер. И. Кутика. М.: Водолей, 2024.
Шекспир 1958 — Шекспир У. Ромео и Джульетта / Пер. Т. Щепкиной-Куперник // Шекспир У. Полн. собр. соч.: В 8 т. / Под общ. ред. А. Смирнова, А. Аникста. Т. 3. М.: Искусство, 1958. С. 5–130.
Dryden 1808 — Dryden J. The grounds of criticism in tragedy // The works of John Dryden: In 18 vols. Vol. 6. London: Printed for William Miller, 1808. P. 244–267.
Otway 1969 — Otway Th. The history and fall of Caius Marius: A facsimile. London: Corn-market Press, 1969.
Pepys 1900 — The diary of Samuel Pepys, M. A., F. R. S. / Ed. with adds. by H. B. Wheatly. Vol. 2. Pt. 1: April 1, 1661 — May 8,1662. New York: Crosup & Sterling Company, 1900.
Pope 1939 — Pope A. The first epistle of the Second book of Horace, Imitated // Pope A. Imitations of Horace. London: Methuen and Co, 1939. P. 189–232.
Shakespeare 1988 — Shakespeare W. Romeo and Juliet. Updated ed. / Ed. by G. Blakemore Evans. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988. (The New Cambridge Shakespeare).
Дживелегов 1945 — Дживелегов А. К. Театр и драма периода Реставрации // История английской литературы. Т. 1. Вып. 2 / Под ред. М. П. Алексеева и др. М.; Л.: Изд-во Акад. Наук СССР, 1945. С. 231–255.
Щербакова 2009 — Щербакова Т. В. Трактовка героического кодекса трагедии «Спасенная Венеция» Т. Отуэя // Филология и искусствоведение. 2009. № 3. С. 99–102.
Clark 2008 — Clark S. Shakespeare and other adaptations // A companion to Restoration drama / Ed. by S. J. Owen. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. P. 274–290.
Dobson 1992 — Dobson M. The making of the national poet: Shakespeare, adaptation and authorship. 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Fisk 2000 — The Cambridge companion to English Restoration theatre / Ed. by D. P. Fisk. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
Marsden 1991 — The appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance reconstruction of the works and the myth / Ed. by J. I. Marsden. London; New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
Schramm 1898 — Schramm W. Thomas Otway’s “The History and Fall of Gaius Marius” und Garrick’s “Romeo and Juliet” in ihrem Verhältnis zu Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” und den übrigen Quellen. Greifswald: Druck von Julius Abel, 1898.
Taylor 1990 — Taylor G. Reinventing Shakespeare: A cultural history, from the Restoration to the present. London: The Hogarth Press, 1990.
Wallace 1988 — Wallace J. M. Otway’s “Caius Marius” and the exclusion crisis // Modern Philology. Vol. 85. Νο. 4. 1988. P. 363–372.
