The fate of Varius' Thyestes in the context of Augustus' cultural policies

Authors

  • M. V. Shumilin The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2017-3-4-188-201

Keywords:

Varius, Varius' Thyestes, Augustus, Seneca's Thyestes, cultural policies, propaganda

Abstract

L. Varius Rufus' lost tragedy Thyestes appears to have been one of the poetic texts that were most infuential and most supported by the state at the beginning of Augustus' rule; at the same time, by the end of his reign, Augustus seems to have abandoned serious support of its diffusion. The article puts forward the hypothesis that Seneca's Thyestes is to a considerable extent dependent on this tragedy and that some features of Varius' work can be reconstructed from Seneca's play. It appears that Varius criticized Mark Anthony and Cleopatra, recently defeated by Octavian, but failed to dedicate any extensive positive praise of the princeps. Early Augustus' interest in using drama for political needs can be explained by his wish, within the context of a fashion for esoteric learned poetry, to turn to a more conservative genre oriented towards communicating with the people as a whole: thus, he sought to restore the pragmatic context and the content features of Athenian tragedy. But the momentary relevance of Athenian-style tragedy was a bad ft with regard to its future use in propaganda, while the successful compromise between “democratic” features and learned style achieved in Vergil's Aeneid was the primary reason why Augustus reconsidered the guidelines of his cultural policies and abandoned his reliance on drama.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brink C. O. Horace on poetry. Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.

Buchheit V. Mythos und Geschichte in Ovids Metamorphosen I // Hermes. Bd. 94. 1966. S. 80-108.

Champlin E. Nero. Cambridge, MА: The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 2003.

Clarke M. L. Higher education in the ancient world. London; New York: Routledge, 2012.

Coarelli F. Palatium: Il Palatino dalle origini all'impero. Roma: Quasar, 2012.

Commager S. The odes of Horace: A critical study. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1962.

Accius. Œuvres: Fragments / Texte établi, trans. et comm. par J. Dangel. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1995.

Feeney D. C. Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate and the traditions of literary history in the Epistle to Augustus // Traditions and contexts in the poetry of Horace / Ed. by A. J. Woodman, D. C. Feeney. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002. P. 172-187.

Hardie P. R. Tales of unity and division in imperial Latin epic // Literary responses to civil discord / Ed. by J. H. Molyneux. Nottingham: Univ. of Nottingham, 1993. P. 57-71.

Hollis A. Fragments of Roman poetry c. 60 BC - AD 20. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007.

Jocelyn H. D. [Review of Lefèvre 1976] // Gnomon. Bd. 50. 1978. S. 778-780.

Kay P. Rome's economic revolution. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2014.

La Penna A. Horace, Augustus, and the question of the Latin theatre // Oxford readings in Classical Studies. Horace: Satires and epistles / Ed. by K. Freudenburg. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009. P. 386-401.

Lange C. H. Res Publica Constituta: Actium, Apollo and the accomplishment of the triumviral assignment. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2009.

Leigh M. Lucan and the Libyan tale // Journal of Roman Studies. Vol. 90. 2000. P. 95-109.

Leo F. De Senecae tragoediis observationes criticae. Berlin: Apud Weidmannos, 1878.

Lefèvre E. Der Thyestes des Lucius Varius Rufus: Zehn Überlegungen zu seiner Rekonstruktion. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, 1976.

Lefèvre E. Studien zur Originalität der römischen Tragödie: kleine Schriften. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2015.

Manuwald G. Roman Republican theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011.

Tacitus. Dialogus de oratoribus / Ed. by R. Mayer. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.

O'Hara J. Inconsistency in Roman epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007.

Lucan. De Bello Ciuili Book I / Ed. with a commentary by P. Roche. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009.

Scriverius P. L. Annaeus Seneca, tragicus… Leiden: Apud Iohannem Maire, 1621.

Sider D. Didactic poetry: The Hellenistic invention of a pre-existing genre // Hellenistic studies at a crossroads: Exploring texts, contexts and metatexts / Ed. by R. Hunter, A. Rengakos, E. Sistakou. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2014. P. 13-29.

Tarrant 1976 -Seneca. Agamemnon / Ed. with a comment. by R. J. Tarrant. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1976.

Tarrant R. Senecan drama and its antecedents // Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Vol. 82. 1978. P. 213-263.

Tarrant R. [Review of Lefèvre 1976] // Classical Review. 1979. P. 149-150.

Seneca's Thyestes / Ed., with intro. and comment. by R. Tarrant. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1985.

Wilamowitz U. Lesefrüchte // Hermes. Bd. 34. 1899. S. 203-230.

Zanker P. The power of images in the age of Augustus / Trans. by A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor: The Univ. of Michigan Press, 1988.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shumilin M.V. The fate of Varius’ Thyestes in the context of Augustus’ cultural policies // Shagi. 2017. Vol. 3, no. 4. P. 188–201. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2017-3-4-188-201

Коды статьи

  • EDN ORRFXX
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)